Mathematician Watson who worked on the famed notebooks said regarding some of Srinivasa Ramanujan’s equations: “*a thrill which is indistinguishable from the thrill which I feel when I enter the Sagrestia Nuovo of the Capella Medici and see before me the austere beauty of the four statues representing “Day,” “Night,” “Evening,” and “Dawn” which Michelangelo has set over the tomb of Giuliano de’Medici and Lorenzo de ‘Medici.*” [Quoted by computer scientists Borwein, Borwein and Bailey in their great paper on Ramanujan and ]. This very thrill is something that a mere mortal like us can also experience when gazing at the monuments of the great men like Euler, Gauss and Ramanujan. This indeed is the basis of this note.

In 1772 the blind Euler discovered a remarkable parabola: . For the value of is a prime number. Thus we see 41-1 primes consecutively generated by it:

41, 43, 47, 53, 61, 71, 83, 97, 113, 131, 151, 173, 197, 223, 251, 281, 313, 347, 383, 421, 461, 503, 547, 593, 641, 691, 743, 797, 853, 911, 971, 1033, 1097, 1163, 1231, 1301, 1373, 1447, 1523, 1601

Interestingly this parabola is one of a set of special parabolas with deeper connections elsewhere. One notices that it can be written as:

Now the following other parabolas of such a form exist:

All these parabolas can also be written as:

They all generate primes consecutively for . Moreover they are increasingly productive in terms of prime-production. For each value of we tabulate below and the number of primes produced by these equations for

One notices that the set culminates in Euler’s original parabola, which is rather remarkably rich in its prime-generative capacity. The numbers also have several remarkable properties. Consider the following cubic equations whose non-cube coefficients relate to the number -2:

Their roots form a peculiar figure on the complex plane (Figure 1) with the real roots (shown next to each equation) falling successively on the positive x-axis.

Now for each of these roots if we compute: successively we interestingly get where from the above Euler parabolas. Even more strikingly these values of are approximations of where is a multiple of 32. These striking relationships are tabulated below. Notably, the largest exhibits the relationship which is almost the integer 32.

Further as gets bigger the values of and either approximation get closer and strikingly the values become almost integers. The last expression for also leads to the below expression which is a very close near integer:

This is also the basis of the famous and good approximation of :

It is correct to 30 decimal places and is greater by . Mysteriously, the largest is associated with another near integer relationships involving and :

The near integer values of for the larger of these brings us to the remarkable discovery of several such near integers for other where is a positive integer by the 26 year old Srinivasa Ramanujan. To look closer at these we computed the values of for and looked for those values. Figure 2 shows the , where is the nearest integer. A table of these values along with the difference from and also the = values and differences (last two columns) are provided.

Figure 3 shows the distribution of the . We notice a striking peak of 27 at . Otherwise with a mean of 10 and standard deviation of 3.52 the distribution of differences is fairly uniform. Hence, this production of near integers by does not seem to be by chance alone ().

In 16 of these cases (tabulated below) similar to the near integers of the 43, 67, 163 system we saw above.

Of these three (43, 67, 163) belong to the above system. A further is the double of 163 but it does not show the = approximation. Three numbers are multiples of 29: ; ; . feature 193. Then we have 37 and its double 74. Of these the Ramanujan set of show a relationship similar to those seen from the above set with 744: where is the integer approximation of :

But beyond these I am not aware of any other such simple formulae that produce the remaining approximating integer values. The link to 29 however lies at the heart of a class of remarkable approximations of discovered by Ramanujan of the type:

There is some connection between this and our previous article. The explosive values emerging from the solution of cakravāla equation are analogous by to the “special” near integer approaches of . Indeed, deeper links beyond the superficial comparison exist between the cakravāla-type equations and these systems, which were discovered by Ramanujan through the approximations of like the one provided above. One such link works thus: Consider the cakravāla indeterminate equation,

Consider a second indeterminate equation in for same ,

Now if then the following holds,

We see that fulfills the above criterion. Hence,

; by cakravāla we get , thus:

Thus, we can write an approximation of in terms of the cakravāla result for 29 as:

Finally, while not a near integer there is one involving the Golden ratio in the same genre:

; thus, we get.

Other than the famous paper mentioned above while writing this we came across formulae of the Ramanujan type discovered by Tito Piezas with new cakravāla connections. One may also study the related formulae of the Chudnovsky brothers. All of these show that what’s discussed here is merely the tip of the iceberg. Much of the deeper connections regarding these systems lie outside our very meager mathematical knowledge, hence we stop here. Briefly, the values of the above Euler parabolas are precisely the numbers which Gauss first connected to some deep mathematics. Thus, the mysterious connections presented here are not coincidental. It stems from some very deep modern results which started with Carl Gauss’ discovery of a function of the complex variable known as the j-function. It has wended its way via Gauss’s student Dedekind’s function and through Ramanujan’s discovery of the above-discussed near integers and other things from his “lost notebook”. Finally in our times it has led to something called the *Monstrous Moonshine* which lies outside the perimeter of our mathematical education. We are simply recording some of what we have explored for ourselves (well-known to mathematicians) for their astounding nature. Fittingly, some physicists hold that these might have deep connections to the very nature of existence.